Let us also remember, however, that the commercial dynamic is at play here as well. Livelihoods are dependant, in fact, directly and indirectly, across many economic sectors, on such things being created, delivered, and consumed; and as far as profits are concerned, at the very least, it is always a case that more is better.
THE CATCH-22 OF MASS-PRESCRIBING ANTIBIOTICS
See Also:
[Post Note: Let us also not forget that drugs represent so much that is possible profit wise that corruption is a likely going to be a companion problem to whatever else we find in their total mix of pluses and minuses; at least when they can be encouraged to be such a hot commodity. J.V.]
[Post Note: And speaking of unintended effects, though one might have expected a good deal more in the sense of anticipating problems, we have the ever present problem now of "The Internet of Things" being left with considerably less interference protection than pretty much everyone would have ever hoped for. But in point of fact this is simply another case of Capitalism not being able to factor in all of the life cycle costs of a product into the purchase price. And so you are left not only vulnerable, but holding the bag for who's going to have to pay to fix the mess that will undoubtedly arise from it all. J.V.]
COULD A STRANGER HIJACK YOUR SMART HOME?
[Post Note: Better to get rid of money altogether. I'm telling you. Keeping this damned system of money fueled mayhem going is simply way more terrible downside than it could ever possibly be worth. J.V.]
[Post Note: Let us also not forget that drugs represent so much that is possible profit wise that corruption is a likely going to be a companion problem to whatever else we find in their total mix of pluses and minuses; at least when they can be encouraged to be such a hot commodity. J.V.]
More evidence companies pay some doctors to prescribe opioids
[Post Note: And speaking of unintended effects, though one might have expected a good deal more in the sense of anticipating problems, we have the ever present problem now of "The Internet of Things" being left with considerably less interference protection than pretty much everyone would have ever hoped for. But in point of fact this is simply another case of Capitalism not being able to factor in all of the life cycle costs of a product into the purchase price. And so you are left not only vulnerable, but holding the bag for who's going to have to pay to fix the mess that will undoubtedly arise from it all. J.V.]
[Post Note: Better to get rid of money altogether. I'm telling you. Keeping this damned system of money fueled mayhem going is simply way more terrible downside than it could ever possibly be worth. J.V.]
LET'S PAY LESS FOR BETTER PILLS
Building A NASA For Prescription Drugs
A bold solution to America's soaring drug prices.
No comments:
Post a Comment