Wednesday, September 20, 2017

A Key Element In Making It Easier To Turn Off The Inner Dialogue For Better Meditation

Let me start by saying that there must be, unfortunately, a lot of preamble presented, as a necessity, to begin with. Has to happen. Nothing for it.

That being said, however, doesn't automatically suggest that you can't, if you wanted to, jump ahead to the "This Is The Key To Making It Easier To Turn Off The Inner Dialogue For Better Meditation Part" title you will see below. So, if are so inclined, please feel free to do so. You can always come back here if you feel your blood pressure rising.

The preamble is for those of you who, I feel fairly sure, will be shocked, and offended, by what I am suggesting as mental fantasy for meditation (for lack of a better way to describe it). I would remind you, though, that it is, in every sense, an exercise in naughty fantasy precisely because that type of thing is so powerful for us in focusing attention. It also automatically provides the ongoing incentive to want to try and keep building up what is essentially a new discipline. And in my mind, nothing could be more of the Father than that.


[This Is The Preamble For Those Of You Who Will Be Offended]

Let us try to understand something.

Mother Earth wants us to have a very specific, animal connection, to each other. A connection that is quite beyond making babies sex. This connection is to remind us, in a communal way, that we are animals, and that we should always revel in that connection, but do so in a way that keeps the Father happy as well, and that is why separating sex into two distinct categories is absolutely fundamental to a healthy, structured society.

This gets all the more important when you realize that, in the process of the ancient mystic, and Eastern religious traditions, of meditation to attain that point where you can, at will, let go of yourself, and then, hopefully, re integrate back to yourself; that in that process, it is my very deep belief that we remake ourselves; perhaps down to the quantum level.

The question then becomes, remake ourselves into what? And in that lies what is truly breathtaking about what I have discovered, now that I know we are fundamental to energy.

So now, as I have stated before, it's not a question of what could we possibly be able to control in this, but rather, what could possibly be left that we couldn't control; especially if we took the time to become truly good at doing this "letting go of ourselves" thing.

So. That then begs the next question. What does bringing sex into this have to do with the letting go thing. It is this: I believe that there is a way to combine sex, with the "letting go process" so that we can set up an amazing, self reinforcing, way to continually make ourselves better, and have a better understanding of each other in the process; getting, as well, the trifecta benefit of reinforcing the very Cosmolosophy structure that makes this separation of sex a part of its foundation.

So then we must confront the question: Is it morally ok for parents to essentially engage in exploratory sex with their children, and I say that it is absolutely necessary, assuming the child has come to the parent, or has made it clear through their sudden discovery of sensual behavior, that they need, and desire an easy, and most importantly, a playful way to be shown that their erogenous areas are just wonderful parts of being alive, and of being able to explore deeper connections to that very sensuality, even as it also makes the child and parent closer as animals who can think and love and create a great deal more than just more babies; important though that might be.

The biggest thing here, however, is the perspective we must try to find: As it stands now, we give them the language to know the world in one meaning space, but do not give them the corresponding language of understanding in the other meaning space; precisely because we haven't been aware that there was another meaning space. But now that we are aware we must face the fact that our approach to raising children must change.

I expect a good deal of controversy over this position but I do so with a clear conscience. I have lived the existence of a virtual monk for the last, gees, ten years at least. (if not a lot longer) I've done so for two reasons. One, it's not right to start a relationship with another if you are not ready to give of yourself emotionally, as well as intellectually, with the sharing of activities; and with serious face time, and involvement, in all of these, otherwise. If you have something else driving you; demanding everything of you, then you must accept a certain amount of solitary living. And if you are truly into what it is that is making these demands, this is not really that much of a problem for you.

But I am also a virtual monk of another kind. I stay alone because I am a sex addict (among other addictions -- alcohol, meditating itself, gambling, etc -- and yes, you can do too much of any of them). I am capable of giving into any of a variety of inappropriate sexual encounters; and all simply because they are "naughty." And some of these have been particularly so enough to have me be sure to avoid any situations that might put me at risk. I think this is also another reason why I am automatically not one who would hit on any, attractive, other variant of woman (remember, there is truly only one sex). I always assume, no matter how attractive, or stimulating the person is, that the reason for it is simply because they are an outgoing, engaging, and gregarious person who simply wants to engage, in whatever needs to be engaged in, in the most effective way possible. That way I can get meaningfully involved in trying to do the same thing and, wondrously enough, an amazing thing happens; I get completely distracted from the inappropriate stuff, and stick to what is appropriate. An especially good habit to get into in the business world I can tell you, but in the social world, not so much. Fortunately I have been lucky enough to meet a few, very forward people, who took the chance to go out of their way to let me know, clearly, that they wanted more, and, most importantly, were of the appropriate (in the eyes of my community) maturity to make that an informed choice (I have been married three times, and when it was good, it was very good, both emotionally, and sexually).

The main thing that has helped to save me in these situations is that I also have a great sense of empathy. I can't help but see things from the other person's frame of reference, and in that, see that what I may want to think may be going on, isn't so at all (not allowing me to trust what my mistaken body meaning space interpretations are because a too strong sex drive just confuses the hell out of things). The mistaken interpretations that have set my sex-o-meter pegging for all the wrong reasons. I am also fortunate enough to be able to step back and see that it is not the animal need for sexual connection that is the problem. That is a basic part of what the Goddess is. That is just something we must deal with whether it makes us uncomfortable or not. The problem now is that we have to change what we see as appropriate. Then set up a way to ensure that everybody not only understands the need for the new approach, but then also wants to always automatically adhere, as exactly, and as caringly, as is possible, to the new way of life.

I believe that this is exactly what I am now giving you with this new way of doing sex; one semi private, for personal, one to one connection (babies always being the choice of the individual). the other a communal one for either the communion of the family, or for the communion of the community itself; all to better know each other in the ongoing context of whatever current reality we are faced with. And I say this with all seriousness.

If we are to have any hope of doing the kinds of negotiations it will take, on an ongoing basis, in daily life, if we're were to organize ourselves as I have proposed. we will need every tool we can muster to find ways of achieving better balanced connections with our neighbors, our fellow workers, or any other important, situations of the "many" negotiating with other groups of "many." And since about the only other thing we might do for this that the animal kingdom has come up is smelling butts, I for one think communal sex would be the far superior choice.


[This Is The Key To Making It Easier To Turn Off The Inner Dialogue For Better Meditation Part]

OK. First and foremost here is that this should, indeed, be a sensual experience. The more so the better. So the first thing you must do is imagine yourself in this wonderful rain forest naked. The rain is wonderfully warm, and soft, even though it is raining hard at times.

You walk slowly, confidently, barefoot through the squishy ground cover loving the feel of the warm mix of mulch, and rich, pungent earth; always so wet and smooth.

You feel everything around you so deeply, so completely, that you don't even have to think at all about where to step, and where not to step; the automatic pilot of you body meaning side just knowing that here is good, and over there isn't, and there simply isn't any need to worry consciously about it.

In this environment you can be either the child, or the parent, and in it also you can pretend to be doing anything, but doing it as a shared orgasm, in the vein of mutual masterbation (we really need to come up with a better word for playing with ourselves, and each other. Maybe mutual "Giga Wiggling?").

One naughty imagining might be that a mother and her daughter are to have a day of exploring and celebration. Let us say the daughter is 13, just starting menstruation, in possession of more than just baby buds as breasts, and is alive with a whole bunch of good, and bad feelings about it all, and is just not sure of what to do with it any of it. So the Wiccan mother witch (in her own sense of herself) decides that this will be a day of celebrating the wild magic that is inside them together, and so they must run off into the woods to be wild together. and in that they will boldly walk through the village naked together, showing off their wonderful sexuality without any shame at all, or fear (for the villagers know what is about to be shared), and then race, tickling and touching, as if to find more ticklish spots to gain a giggle advantage over the other, out over the rich fecundity of this lush green, and brown, and every other color of the rainbow, of flower, environment to a secret waterfall only the mother knows about. And when the child asks the mother why they are going there, or are out here like this at all, the mother replies, even as she whirls around to grab the daugher up in her, surprisingly strong, arms; hugging her child, but also rubbing up against her so as to tickle a little differently all about each other's sensitive areas "Oh my sweet baby. God how I love you. You just can't know how lucky I feel to have you, to hold you, and to see you now becoming a woman in all the important ways. The Goddess is in you sweetie, just like she's in me, even though I know it confuses you so much."

"I love you too mommy. It feels so good to be here with you. But why are we here?"

To celebrate you blood sweetheart. Your beauty. And the fact that it's ok to be horny as hell. She wants you to be horny as hell because that's what get's more babies made, but we don't have to have baby sex to enjoy our bodies sweetie. The Goddess gave us sex to be close to each other; close in so many ways other than baby sex. And we can be wonderfully naughty in this sharing kind of sex and it's OK."

"Naughty how mommy?"

And that's when mommy gives her daughter a wicked grin and says "...Well... why don't we begin by peeing on each other," whereupon she pulls her daughter down to the grass and, using a quick tickle to roll the younger girl to one side as she then rolls to her own back, shifts her butt around so that they are now facing each other, on their back sides, and almost close enough to have their knees touch. Thus positioned, she then proceeds to let forth an amazingly big stream of yellow urine at the daughter, raising her hips up expertly so as to aim the flow to hit right at the younger girl's vagina.

This both, surprises, shocks, delights, and infuriates the daughter. Her whole body now vibrates across so many kinds of frequencies. Too many now even for physicists to figure out yet, but she shouts back a "Mom!" that is both little girl, big girl, half angry, half aroused, and half "oh yeah? You want a piece of me tough guy...? Well, game on!" Whereupon, without even consciously willing it, she squirts right back and, without having much practice, goes all over her mom's belly, her breasts, and her face; and it is a lot; a surprising "a lot."

Her mom's reaction, though, is even more surprising. Instead of laughing and firing back with her own super soaker, the mom is suddenly radiating pure sexual stimulation; radiating it as another kind of loving mommy glow from somewhere the daughter can only feel.

"Oh baby. God how I love to feel your warm pee on me. It's magic cum you know, our pee is. Even though it looks like urine most of the time, it is pure magic seed. It is an essence of us, just as semen is out of a penis. Part of our energy to create. My magic, and daddy's magic came together to make you, you know. Beautiful, beautiful magic."

And at that moment the daughter is suddenly aware, sexually, of just how beautiful her mother is. Of just how unabashedly sensual, confident, and so appealing she is, and it shocks her again that she wants to touch her mother there. Even more surprising yet, however, is that her mother seems to sense her sudden interest and it only serves to make her radiate even more desire.

Whereupon her mother giggles. "Oh you sweet beautiful girl. I can feel your desire you know. I can because I have become strong with the Goddess's meaning space; as you will become strong. What you feel is what the Goddess wants you to feel because she is desire, and orgasm. She makes us crave it. But she has seen the wisdom of the Father. She knows now that we must channel these things the right way. So we can drink of each other baby, in the family. We can touch each other. It's OK because that's just mommy, or daddy love for their child; not baby making love. Can you feel that difference sweetie?"

"I don't know mommy."

"You're not sure yet, and that's OK too. If you don't want to explore this yet you don't have you know. There's no rush. But if you feel the desire like I think you do, then don't be afraid to give in to it. This is how you come to understand that your sexuality isn't something you need to hide at all. Your desire for it. That crazy way it just makes you want to lose yourself in it. That's OK too sweetie."

The mother waits a moment, seeing whether the daughter wants to pull away or not, and when she doesn't, the mother knows her trust in her gut wasn't wrong.

The mom then kind of sidled up closer to the daughter, putting one leg over her daughter's belly, and then pulling the younger girl's other leg up over her belly. And to the daughter's new shock, the mother is suddenly pressing vagina to vagina

"Mom! What are you doing?" The look on the daughter's face is both shock now, and the new sense of sensation that sends electric currents up through her groin, her middle, breasts and a point of hunger in her mind she has been trying to ignore for a while now; with questionable success.

Her mom presses in then slowly, making contact with various corresponding parts of labia, clitorous, and increasing wetness. The sudden contact. The immediacy of sensitive skin to sensitive skin takes the daughter's breath away, and without realizing it, and without any sense of control, she is pushing back against her mother and she moans in a way she never knew she could. She moans and she understands now just how primal that need she's been trying to ignore is.

"Mommy... What are you doing to me?"

"I'm not doing anything to you sweetheart, I'm doing something with you. I want to be the first one you share an orgasm with. I want to be the one who helps you understand just how wonderful it can be."

The mother is still moving slowly, in a soft, circular motion, that's more caress, and nuzzle, than real pushing against. And now she too is moaning a bit at sporadic moments.

"Oh mommy... It feels so good..."

"I know it sweetheart. It is good. And the best thing is that this is just us sharing something that will make us love each other more, and understand each other more. Help me be a better mommy to you whatever age you are at."

The daughter is breathing harder and harder now realizing for the first time that she really does need to do this. She really, really, needs to do this, and also realizing that it really will end up just making them closer. And suddenly the hunger just takes over and the daughter just gives in to the whole experience; now pushing hard against her mother's vagina in pure animal lust, which is certainly all that the mother needed to respond in kind, and the rest you can imagine quite well on your own, because this is a fantasy, after all, and you can make it as real as it needs to be. And again, that is the point.

You can use your imagination in this way to create a very stimulating, visual, and oral experience, and you can do it without the dialogue, because all you really need is the ideas expressed in your head ahead of time for the desired situation, and then just visualize it. Try to actually feel all of the sensations in your mind as you listen to the patter of water on leaves, and the sound of birds chirping, and insects humming. Making believe further, perhaps, that the rain itself is the Goddess's own pee, and it is so warm and sensual for precisely that reason. Try also to understand the wisdom inherent in this idea of separating communing sex, from making babies sex (whether babies are intended or not). Do this as sharing sex and you will be as amazed as our imaginary little girl at just how much you can come to love, and understand, your family, your friends, and your co workers.

I know. Now you are picking your jaw up from off of the floor.

Wait. Did he just suggest that we have communig sex with, well, just about everybody in our lives?

Yes. That is exactly what he means. And the quicker we come to terms with this the better.













Sunday, September 17, 2017

Make The Magic

Make the magic
come.
Make Gobs
and gobs of streaming
delicious magic come.
Make the magic
she makes you
wild with.
Make the magic
as naughty wild
as you like to be,
because the first C.S.
will make a special
thoughtful, loving, pocket
universe for you;
so slippery
for the Giga Wiggles
to come into
with your wild
streaming magic.
And you will
come to it
In that "Other Net"
and with each other
personally sharing
the coming as brothers
and sisters, and community
members sharing members.
A different kind
of coming;
not like the one
with the one
to make another one.
Make the magic come
and you will feel
what I see
you're making yourselves
to be so much better as
you would ever dream
to come to be.
So come inside
of me and make
a better reality
to live, love,
build and be free.







Saturday, September 16, 2017

There Is A "Body Meaning Space" Network In Existence Now

Always has been of course. But since we've not been aware of a real, honest to goodness, other meaning space, most of us don't spend much time trying to communicate with it. If you get into Cosmolosophy, and understand the model, as well as what's been posted in the last 6 or seven ( maybe more) Cosmolosophy posts, you will be able to access this other network.

To do that, however, you are going to have to master the habit of turning the inner dialog off. That means not running the mind meaning space stream of words you use to keep your own thoughts and commentary of what is going on around, and in you. And yes, I do know how hard that can be. It only takes a little patience, though, and practice, to get into the groove on this. Especially if you can focus on something other than words; which, helpfully, are any of the things you can get and feel through your body; and for which you can use your imagination to put yourself into completely.

One of the best ones for me are any of the many sonic head spaces you can access on YouTube. The one you see linked below is the one I currently use. One nice thing about this is that you can use one of these, shared with anybody else you care to share it with, to help you link to this sonic space, common point of reference, with your friends.

A lot of this is symbolic, of course, but that's the point. You are trying to convince yourself to the greatest degree possible. That's how this magic works. If you believe it enough, you can make the link happen.

This, kids, is the "Other Net" you should be connecting to; at least a good deal more than you connect to this one. Sure, use this to get the best information you can, but use the other one to do a lot more of your social networking on. I can only hope that you will believe me when I tell you that this Other Net is the one that will give you the much better thoughtful, and loving, connection. And you can use it to connect with your friends and loved ones whether they are with you physically, or not.

This is also, unfortunately, the kind of practice work you will have to do if you expect to become a thoughtful, loving mage, of a thoughtful, loving, and working for the balance, society. When you start to see what is possible in that society you will truly know why you're asking the wrong question with what is possible here.  That's not it at all. The real question is what isn't possible. Especially if we are energy, and the entirety is a thing of unbounded, infinite, potential.

4K Tropical Rain & Relaxing Nature Sounds - Ultra HD Nature Video









Tuesday, September 12, 2017

The Cosmolosophy Diagram

This is my first attempt at presenting a outlining diagram of the meaning space relationships of Cosmolosophy, and how it sits vis a vie the Entirety. Others of you, as this meaning system gains inertia in the, understanding of itself, and the believing in magic power aspects of the mega message as a whole, will begin to create your own personal, and group, variations; with their own unique areas of emphasis. Also, as this thing gains power, others of you from the creative commentariat, the creative charismatics this thing captures, and academia, etc. , will begin to feel compelled to add to the ability of others to understand more quickly.

This thing is gaining power and I feel it more and more every day. As such, I'll probably not be uttering a whole lot for a while. The process must now await several key trigger events before it can go any further, and how long that will take I cannot say. As this develops now, though, I must let the process take its natural course. I am seeing, and feeling, some amazing new things, almost on an hourly basis now (I find that I must spend the day in almost constant meditation to keep it all from overwhelming me), and I am very reluctant to say anything more for fear of prejudicing the natural flow of things. This will happen now as it was meant to happen, and we must all be patient.

Change is coming. Everybody feels it. What will the change be? That's the question, isn't it. But the real bottom line issue is that choice is still there for the taking. You can choose to do nothing, or you can choose to participate in a change event that will, I guarantee you, knock a whole lot more than just everybody's socks off.

I leave it to you then. And just to give you one really, really, important hint, I am now full of nothing but great hope, and a very good feeling that this will work out in a "the way its supposed to" that will be more than any of you could ever imagine, and rightly so; that was my job, and I think you are going to be very pleased. Just remember. The two elementals created me to do this one thing. I have done it. The rest is up to you. Find the balance (for this is what we will all be pledging ourselves to) between the "Mother," and the "Father," (as well as between the one, and the many) and you will find not only the path to yourself, and your place among the many, but a great deal more. You will see, and feel it, to the very core of your being.









Saturday, September 9, 2017

A Different Puzzle Piece, But Important None The Less

Let me be clear here when I say that this stuff just drops in on me, when it drops in, and it doesn't matter to the balance whether I understand where the new piece is supposed to fit; or that I get to have them in a sequencing order known only to the two of them (the elementals). As such, I'll get one, some of the stuff in it won't be exactly clear yet, even to me, and then, days or even weeks later, I'll get another and this one will make stuff from the last one much more clear, and not only that, it also then smacks me in the face with a new conclusion, or consequence, connection to the previous post, and x number of others. And wham bam, thank you ham, the two of them get something the balance feels is important out to the rest of you. And my understanding of things grows a little more.

Let me be clear that this may also be only pure fantasy on my part, and I might just be trying to suck you all into my delusion. Anything is possible. You really, really need to start rethinking your full, in the gut, as well as the head, take on this. Let us also be clear on the fact that, since anything is possible, magic itself is also not only possible, but a good deal more than just simply so.

That being said, this next bit of conclusion might seem a bit off of the more recent, sorta, theme, but it will be important to understand very soon. And I'm not exactly sure why yet, but I guess we'll see.

This is going to be a restatement of a fact that most biologists already know. It is a myth that we don't actually start out as female, but that it is true that the first 5 to 6 weeks of gestation, what is expressed first is female. and even though the structural info instantiated, then, is nominally interchangeable (I love modularity), in my sense of things from the balance, the fact that these are the female side of things, instantiations, that it still clearly puts the full, larger essence of where they came from, in the side of Mother Earth. And that, to me, says that there are now only one sex in the human race; a sex that has a woman with a vagina, and a woman with a penis; making the penis version just a woman variant.

And in this what may be confusing us, among other other things of course, is first, where does the idea of "Father," or "Mother" come from in the first place, and secondly, where does the idea of "Male" come from.

Another confusion, of course is that male, and father, then, have to be the same thing; which is nonsense. Male does not have to be connected with father at all. Any more than mother has to be connected to female.

How could this be otherwise when, in the very truest of sense, we are both female nurturers in significant part (because us penis variants are half the other), and where "nurturing" is so vast, and incalculable in how many ways it can be thoughtfully, and lovingly applied, how can you differentiate in that context at all; regardless of course whether you are a vagina, or penis variant.

Nature needed genetic mixing so sex was a forgone conclusion (if you wanted us to appear), but the entirety also has an energy duality to administer to so why not combine the two problems so that the meaning processors thus created can have a sense of where they came from. This is, in my opinion, why we have a kind of species memory of the basic notions of the father, and the mother, but notice here, this has nothing to do with parenting children as far as the entirety is concerned, or the two elementals. She only cares about individuals to the degree that they make that line of life more adaptable to change, as well as their willingness to sacrifice, and just keep procreating. And he only cares about creating more structure, rigidly in line with what has gone on before, and that some individuals have to be made superior to others so as to make for clear lines of command, control, and discipline.

The important part to remember in the above is that, in both of the two qualities I have described, for both sides of the divide, as far as who fills what role, is there no real indication that they require them be filled by what is either now associated with female, or male. Either is capable and, with the right nurturing to guide them, could do either if it was necessary. And do it equally well if they were both encouraged, to do both behaviors. Which again, is simply more application of balance.

The other part of this, certainly, is our quandary with gender preference and identity. Man, did we get our heads mixed up with that one. But then, given that this reality started from nothing but a singular frame of reference, and then associated, willy nilly, until it created not only planets, but life, and an unbelievable mix of it as well, finished off with a meaning processor who can make choices; in all of that did you expect that it would be left to something, automatically quite straightforward and simple? Not on your life.

As I feel it now I think it is just a very complicated throw of the dice. There are inertias (or delta-v's) involved of course; coming from all over the place. Some of it is from the preference/identity of the individuals involved in the conception; and perhaps there, even to the degree that they are, or are not, really involved at all. If you are just showing up for the team then, who knows? And who knows about a thousand gegillion gegillion other possibilities. Maybe even the idea of being "multipath," or not, could enter into it in just unbelievably crazy kinds of cross channel talk. And then there are these elemental tendencies themselves. These are not actual entities mind you, but they do represent very real tendency and defined purpose. These could be adding inertias (or delta-v's) of their own.

The important part, though, in my opinion, is that we simply have to get over this ludicrous idea that any mix of preference/identity, and whether you are a female with a vagina, or a female with a penis, is, or could ever be wrong, simply because of its existence. What the mix is, is irrelevant. It ought to be like asking what the mix of hair colors are. Who cares as long as the love is expressed with respect, and feeling, for both the individuals in the relationship, as well as their combination together with each other. Because with using the balance in that regard can you build good, caring societies, that become stable enough to begin creating the generational support structures (child to parent to grandparent, on and on) that starts to put real roots down for that society into the ground, and now up into the stars.

There is also one other thing here that I should mention as an important side note.

One of the reasons why I believe that the participants of conception might be involved in the preference/identity question is that it is my strong belief that we all give off a kind of sex EMP pulse at the moment of climax.

Most of us, ordinarily, are not tuned to receive less prominent analogue signals; the very ones, certainly, that we get from the Body Meaning Space side of things. If you make it your life's work to better develop those kinds of receptions, as well as make sense out of them, you might imagine that some better ability to do this sensing can develop. I can attest to you that this is indeed the case.

For as long as I can remember, it seems to me that women have always had the biggest of these pulses by far when they can achieve the full climax that they are capable of. I suspect there might be bias in this perception that gender is in any way a determining factor. Setting that aside, however, it is still quite true that a signal of some sort is given off. I mention this now because you ought to be clear on the fact that this energy is accessible and can be used to increase one's connection to one's partner. This is why the idea of Tantric Sex, and Tantric union in general came to be. In fact one old way of looking at what ritualized sex was in celebration of, say, Druid Tradition, was that they wanted to share a sex fantasy, with a very specific mindset for what the fantasy was about, with a lot of mythic connections to the ether and the real world, so that when they began to engage in it they did so with full believing intent.

Believe it or not, it may have been, in those olden days, on one occasion or another, that they didn't just then start the usual, (boring mostly in porn) varied couplings of ordinary human sex. No. They began the organized creation of a group, shared, self hypnosis, that put them in a position to have climax be equivalent to letting go of themselves; letting go of themselves as filtering identities so as to be without ego; knowing ahead of time that they would be coming, and falling into their deity, to be allowed to reintegrate in the cosmic womb, not only with each other, but with their deity as well. In that kind of connection one might be able to make a kind of EMP Sex bomb I think. A bomb, if it were powerful enough, that would make even the non believers go into an equal state of regenerative climax, and for a significant distance for the epicenter.

Just a possibility of course. A new conjecture on an old idea. Maybe magic is possible. Maybe it isn't. Maybe that conjecture is possible. Maybe it isn't. I guess we'll have to wait and see. You absolutely have to admit, though, that it is interesting as the idea of "Infinite Potential."





Wednesday, September 6, 2017

What Is Recombinative, Mega Message?

Think of something akin to what Neil Stephensens "Snow Crash" tried to predict, or at least tried to consider the possibility of.

Now that Cosmolosophy has three meaning spaces with which to work with, we can now show how the mechanism for a "new technology sufficiently advanced to be indistinguishable from magic," but for which we simply haven't found a name for yet, we can link things together from other phenomena to see that hypnosis was only a small example of what translating across meaning spaces might be able to accomplish.

In my opinion, hypnosis uses both sides of the elemental divide, but is centered primarily on the Father Fortress side. Messages are possible, however, with bigger inputs from the Mother Earth side, which can add a significantly larger aspect to how change can be initiated; which would certainly seem logical seeing as how much that automatically encompasses a good deal of Physical Meaning space.

The problem then becomes how one gets one's head around, much less utilizes, the codec of Body Meaning space. I, for one, am thankful that is still a problem, but rest assured, it will not remain one indefinitely.

That being said, however, doesn't change the fact that we still ought to take this idea very seriously. Why you might ask?

This is because of our old friend Mr. Murphy again. You know the drill here: if it can happen, it will happen, eventually. Which is to say that some people might simply stumble into (as I have stumbled upon many things in the past) into any of the many, possible, sudden "muscle memory" insights that let them do things with both sides as a kind of savant absorption. And let me be reiterate here, this has happened to me so I know it is more than just possible.

It would take a big roll of the big improbable dice (I like to think of metaphoric die the size of multiple galaxies, with as many sides as there are atoms there) to get things to come up just right certainly, for big "not very probables;" but things have already been going quite a while now, and you never know when the improbable might happen. And I worry that it will happen to charismatic, creative people first because they are both more susceptible to "greater connections" across multiple meaning spaces, and also because they are so much more able to actually make use of such greater descriptive/communicative constructs in the first place.

As such, society must learn to be very careful with charismatic, creative people.

On the one hand we absolutely need them to help solve the complex problems to come. On the other hand they can be quite dangerous, because they can literally alter reality without being aware of it (or in the not so distant future manipulate it with cold calculation) even more so than the rest of us, because we all have the potential ability to use "Mega Message."

Without even realizing it, the charismatic, in utilizing Mega Message, puts that retrovirus, meaning re write, into the identity/meaning matrices of what are now turned into true believers in a very disturbing new way. First, it somehow turns off a kind of switch in the believers that leaves them not wanting to make their own meaning choices any more; for now they have a perceiver to do that for them. That's bad enough, of course, but then, because the charismatic is now  "the one," they pour back into him meaning energy they were once pushing out into existence to keep their own frame of reference. That energy coming back at the charismatic forms a mega message of its own; and this is where it gets very, very, dicey.

I think of this when I think of people like Jim Jones (one could also think of others like Rasputin, or Charles Manson, who were already probably pretty well messed up in the head meaning wise, but who, nevertheless, could still wield the gift in one way or another).

I'd like to think that he started out a decent enough fellow. Someone who had the gift, though, to a significant degree when it comes to charisma and creative expression. Then he meets up with others who may not have the greatest of meaning systems already in place (which is quite understandable in a Capitalist society), and who are probably just as decent a group of folks as well starting out. But the two together? Just think about it.

He's sensitive to a number of things, sees that things aren't quite right, comes up with a formula that starts to make sense to him and, as he begins to talk about it, attracts, and is attracted to, people with weaker meaning systems. The more he talks, the more they listen, and the more they become changed, without hardly even realizing it.

It's not clear to me if there is anything more than just "acknowledgement" in that believer message coming back to the charismatic; acknowledgement taken way, way too far; or whether there may also be other, more subtle subtexts involved, to sway things one way or the other, as far what characterizes this output of change force. The one thing that is clear, though, is that it hits the charismatic with a change in his or hers meaning/identity matrix that they cannot avoid, or necessarily defend themselves against. After that it is anybody's guess as to what the outcome might be.

They might become a monster, or they might become their idea of Christ; which, depending on your point of view, and how the individual in question conceived of Christ in the first place, might still be a monster anyway. This might be especially true if the particular "Christ Manifestation" in question came into begin at the most inopportune moment for a particular set of physical space circumstances; something that might be characterized as trying to do the right thing at the wrong time.

In any case, though, the leadership community of this nation needs to start taking our new operating environment a good deal more seriously as it regards what it used to call Propaganda. They need to do this, of course, because it's "whole new ballgame now baby." And sooner than you might think, if we don't kill ourselves in the meantime, some folks are going to be swinging magic bats.

The first line of defense is to know that a vulnerability exists. The next is to try and figure out countermeasures. And in the latter regard, the first one to establish is simply to pre innoculate folks with their own, personal, very strong meaning systems. The stronger those are, the harder it will be for a Mega Message to work a presto-word-o-giga-wiggly, digi-tactilization, of message manipulation. My hope is that just knowing about Cosmolosophy, and using it to your personal needs (changing it as you need to) will fill that need. Or at least it will be a good place to start preparing a better antiviral message. Either way works for me.







Tuesday, September 5, 2017

Lots Of Giga Wiggles Going Into You

I'm pushing,
and you're pulling through,
lots giga wiggles into you.
Makes you smile.
Makes you mean it too.
Because you make
the connection
for what this ought to
rub you into.
With meaning
you recreated yourself.
Don't worry.
It'll all balance out
just as fine
as you keep feeling it.





Monday, September 4, 2017

A Basic Statement of Cosmolosophy

We are a fundamental part of the duality of energy.

This is so because, as already stated, on the one hand, The Elemental Embrace, or the need to come together and exchange, can now be thought of as the metaphorical elemental Mother Earth; and that this side also corresponds to the wave aspect of energy. As such, something has to be rubbing somewhere, and that means a feeling of some kind which I believe is perceived in Body Meaning Space.

Then, on the other hand, what I started out calling Mind, representing all aspects of objectification, language, rationality, and the identities it creates in meaning processors; this we can now refer to as the metaphorical elemental Father Fortress. As such, because a meaning processor with an identity necessitates the concept of "point of view," we can feel justified in having this also represent the quanta specific side of the energy duality.

There won't ever be a way to objectively prove this, even though it will have the potential to be felt very deeply. Obviously then, what I'm talking about had to be presented as a set of ideas to create a philosophy. This will feel right to you or it won't. I don't think there'll be a lot in between here at all. The question then becomes will an extra majority of us come to share the feeling or not. My spidey sense says they will. It has been saying that to me, in various incomplete forms, without me being fully aware of it, for decades now. And if I am wrong, which I also assure you I do believe is possible, then I promise you I'll shut up and let the rest of you get on with life. I will get back to what I always do: Work the problem. And one of the nice things about that option is that it would be interesting to see exactly where I went wrong. And who knows... Maybe I could find a fix to make the package right again, or maybe not. The real point for me is that there would still be plenty for me to be deeply involved in.

You must ask yourselves now what you will intend to be deeply involved in.






Thursday, August 31, 2017

The Mantra Of The Elementals, And Parents Everywhere

I am you
And you
Are me, and
togehter we must work
to help our children see
How a better ballance
Might live
a better way to be.
The one,
and the whole,
the point, and
the never ending vibration,
connecting
the way it ought to be.







Wednesday, August 30, 2017

What If...

...Physical meaning space were as susceptible to suggestion as Mind meaning space is.

Quite a "what if", right?

And even though I know it's a stretch, I feel it is all too possible, and real.

In thinking about this, it seems to me, it would seem reasonable to assume that Body meaning space, and Mind meaning space would have to be working together to make it possible for a mind to change (or allow to be changed) its meaning configuration, if ever so minutely, and however briefly, enough so as that the mind could accept a meaning set where, suddenly it could feel no pain; or say to see something not there, for example; which is, of course, exactly what a hypnotist can do. And also, of course, sometimes we are all great hypnotists, it's just that the only subject we can work our suggestions on is ourselves. For surely we can talk ourselves into believing many things. For both good, and ill.

What if the mind and body meaning spaces could work something similar to physical meaning space? Silly you say? Are you so sure about that?

It gets a bit trickier when you realize that the same things that hold words, ideas, and all of the further constructs of them that we create, together (and for which so much of our histories, and current cultures are based on), is the same thing that holds matter together: Namely meaningful connections. The only thing different here is the way things are coded, and where the manifestation of that coding exists. And as luck would have it, therein lies another rub.

We've already established (within the defined realm of Cosmolosophy) that everything in the Entirety is semi permeable. If I can receive information, somehow, isn't it reasonable to expect that I can send information as well? And if I can send doesn't it then become simply a problem of how you translate a new kind of meaning construct to make that seductive suggestion (where seductive in this case is just how powerful the connections are)?

This is, of course, where even I have to throw up my hands, in some amount of casual frustration, to ask "Yeah, but how in the hell are we supposed to do that?" And to answer all of us, all I can refer to is my own experience with hypnosis. I'm still not sure what all went into that, but I do know that every part of what I was doing felt right, and made sense. And then that you could feel the right way to apply them, and know the right order in which to do it. And the funny thing is, I got to the point where I could do this knowing and feeling, by starting out with a little knowing, and then feeling my way along, trying to get better at doing both. I had some help from my folks on this (given that they had absolutely no clue whatsoever how to be parents), but primarily it was their personalities themselves that gave me one of the most important first lessons: life is made up of two primal opposites: Worded, stoic logic on the one hand (not at all in touch with the other side), and Wild Magic on the other (not having been given much of a chance to acquire, much less absorb structure, and discipline, and a few other things from his side).

Because I had to bridge that gap as a part of growing up (and in this now I have come to realize that it was learning to read that gave me a way to survive), but I had to do it starting out centered almost completely on her side of things (for which I was open to receiving sensory input from everywhere almost to the point of autism I think). And then, with a big imagination, and big propensity for deep involvement, I had a younger brother survive long enough to teach me not only empathy, and seeing with another's eyes, but also, without knowing it at the time, that you could talk to someone lovingly without using words at all. That when I'd did skin farts on his belly, or played peek a boo with him; that when he laughed, and our eyes met I could see that the very real, little boy inside there, the boy who wasn't broken like his body was (or at least not nearly so), was so grateful for the fact that I knew he was in there as an identity, even though he could give so little indication of it out to us. But then, isn't also lovely that, in one sense laughter is a small thing, even as it flaps just as significantly, as some butterfly somewhere, creating a tremendous effect somewhere else entirely.

When I look back now I can only think of this as magic. Of some wondrous magic that allowed us to communicate to the point where he could have a sense of joy in his life, even though so much of his physical body was broken. All of these things gave me a meaning matrix, Identity aura (for lack of a better descriptive phrase) that was convinced that things weren't right. That I could do something about it, and that I would have to do something about it. And the beautiful part if this is, most of the coding for that was distributed, luckily enough, across each side of the divide, just enough to keep me going; even while my conscious mind did not fully understand why. And slowly I started building enough new meaning structure on both sides to start actively convincing myself that there was a reason I should carry on. And with every new realization in that effort would be new links, back and forth, to the things that had happened, to the things that were happening, and to the things that might be possible for happening; so even more structure yet could be created. And that kept growing, and as it did, it kept making my ability to not only convince myself effectively, but to show others that a surprising amount of things can be changed simply by the right suggestion at the right time. It all depends on the meanings and the connections. Meanings and connections that must span both body and mind meaning spaces.

If we could harness both of these, balanced in an ever dynamic, ongoing way, we might be able to communicate back to Physical meaning space in ways we've only fantasized about now. Having to always work the tension of knowing that this could be for both good, or ill, and that we will only have the balance itself to guide us. I find the prospect just as thrilling and enthralling, as I find it terrifying, all at the same time. And because there is nothing for it but to continue, why not try to do so with the right balance of those as well.

What do you think?







Saturday, August 26, 2017

The Essential questions of the three meaning spaces of the Entirety:

It's not a question of mind over matter.
It is rather that mind is matter
and matter is mind

Just as:

It is not a question of "does love conquer all?"
It is rather that love cannot encompass anything
without both physical, and body,
meaning space constructs
with which to make meaningful
connections in the first place.

Just as:

It is also not a question of which came first,
the chicken or the egg?
Rather it is accepting
that meaning processors,
and the divine process
that makes processors possible,
both participate in making each other
realized;
realized because they both happened
at the same time because
they have always happened at the same time.


There is, in fact, one frame of reference
where there is only ever
that one same time;
the same moment of question,
answer and a new question
automatically formed
to keep the moment
from ever ending.

We are a part
of that one same
larger frame of moment,
and connected meaning
is the point of it.




Friday, August 25, 2017

There Are No Hertz In My Computer...

...Just Giga Wiggles.

This has been bothering me for a while now and I thought it high time to correct the situation. A public service announcement has been waiting for, rather impatiently I might add, me to take responsibility for seeing to its expression. An announcement, I hasten to add, that is of utmost importance, if not exactly critically so.

In preface here let me just add that I have the highest respect for the physics community for using the name of Heinrich Rudolf Hertz as the unit of measure for waves and oscillations. Perfectly understandable of course. And in purely scientific inquiry, and general academic discourse, keeping with that tradition makes sense. In purely public discourse, however, I think a different term would be a great deal more useful.

So, without further todo let us henceforth use the word wiggles instead of hertz. And in this, of course, a bit of discipline will be required; but nothing that should be too difficult for any of you. And that is simply this: Every time you see something like "4 Ghtz," or "2.5 ghtz," or "500 mhtz" or any other variation of the suffix "htz," combined with an (usually) "m," or "g," or "t," just remember that what we are talking about here are wiggles; despite the significant accomplishments of a significant man.

This is important because it fits in with our duality you see. You know... between Father Fortress and Mother Earth?

This is so for the following reason: in one sense, nothing ever really touches, it only sends and receives wiggles. Then, at another level in that process, there is a kind of rubbing in which they have to use the probability over time, and space, interaction equations, of field theory. The bottom line being that something is rubbing, but it's all rather dicey, literally and figuratively.

However, in another sense "one" thing really does smash into "one"other thing (and why some things have to have a point of reference), and a whole lot of energy is released. Certainly, when my one right hand connects to my one right cheek, I notice in a manner quite different than one would associate with wiggles.

But there you have it, another way of looking at the dichotomy of two metaphorical, philosophical elementals. And a lovely, if I may say so myself, little public service announcement to help remind you to keep a new point of view at hand... Or was that a new sign to wave at as your evolving point of view passes by. Oh well, hardly matters, even as it matters all the time.







Thursday, August 24, 2017

Creative Expressors Are Just As Important As Engineers

What am I including in that category? Well, investigative journalists, beat journalists, op ed journalists, actors, comedians, satirists. You could probably name more here. Certainly a certain class of book author, falling somewhere between, an investigative journalist, and a full blown academic, would be another, though I'm not sure what I'd call the grouping; if one doesn't already exist.

To understand this importance you need only consider how any oral history would have survived at all were it not for the appropriately gifted story teller. How could an account be nearly as involving, as the in the moment experience of a deeply connected people would create, were it not for one who could both feel it properly, and retell it with equal, relative fidelity. And of course, as the operating environments have changed (moving from just oral, to literate, and now to everything at once) over the centuries, the creative expressers have had to change as well.

I mention this, I must confess, out of both purely self interest, but also to point out that we not only need these people, we all need to be able to do at least some of what they can do as well, precisely because it is so important (if for no other reason than we would then have the better ability to recognize good journalism when we saw it).

I know that certain individuals, in particularly high positions of power, are telling you now that these people are not to be trusted. And I also know that these (usually money/promoter types, whether they call themselves business people or not) people are sometimes very clever in how they make their charges seem legitimate in a general sense.  In this, however, I must tell you that they are completely, and utterly, wrong.

Sure. As the quality of workmanship across the country will attest to, for all skills, the particular skill levels, professionalism, focus, and the usual vulnerabilities to temptations of various kinds for all people, leads to a very wide of distribution in what comes out as possible examples of said skill. In large part, however, in most of them, professionalism, and/or competition via skill level, usually puts what works at the forefront; and in this bad doesn't usually work for very long; or at least long in one disguise (which is another thing these money/promoter types are good at putting on, and taking off).

Some people, however, it seems can get away with saying damagingly incorrect things, repeatedly, and people will still listen to them. And for my part I think it is more a reflection of how bad things can get when people have lived so long without the generational consistency, and stability, of "thoughtful, loving structure." And of course, the really interesting thing there is that the particulars of that structure can vary widely and still produce the same structural effect; it will just be from a different frame of reference than ours, and thus may not seem quite right in any number of ways. The very things we must ignore and continue on in our own way, because we have to.

In any case, though, the selfish part here is that I will not be an extensive creative expresser in the dissemination of this idea. I will, of course continue to participate in the debate I hope will arise around it, but the creative expression is not what the observer, and articulator, of process is for (at least no more than any ordinary citizen, which, as already stated, everyone should be at least be capable of). Practically speaking of course, I won't be able to escape all of that responsibility, but I do serve notice that I will limit it as much as I can.

The bottom line here is that I do not wish to be an idea celebrity; running around making money on that fact that I have an "idea brand." And then henceforth propel the brand along on all of the talk shows. There are already a number of people doing that (a lot better than I could) so I don't think we need any more. And please believe me when I say that many of these people are very good at what they do and serve a necessary purpose. And a few, certainly, not so much; which also, to a significant degree, depends on your point of view.

In a sense I guess I have only expanded what I was already doing as an analyst/developer; looking at complex process flows and then reporting back on what I thought the problem was; and then maybe also helping in concocting the design for a solution. All through that, I hasten to add, though, I never felt the need to tout, far and wide, the advantages of a particular design paradigm, or coding language, or whatever else, even if one or another of them felt warranted to be use in a particular solution. For me it was just working the problem, understanding it, and then maybe fixing it.

The real problem here is that we may all be looking at getting kicked out of whatever comfort zone (relatively speaking) we've been able to construct for ourselves; myself included. I can say that because I know incredible demands may be made of all of us if we acknowledge this analysis at all. After all, at the very least, even if my alternative is junked altogether, we'll still be faced with the very clear feeling we've all been having for at least the last five to ten years: Something has to change, and it has to change in a very big way.












Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Why Am I talking About Metaphorical, Cosmological Elementals At All?

Some of you may have been wondering why I've been spending so much post effort on this side of the mechanism of change I'm using (the sociopolitical side via Capitalism Is Obsolete, and the philosophical side here) lately. And more specifically, of course, why I would risk the potential flack, ridicule, or dilution of message conveying what's important in the bigger part of why we need change, on starting talk of cosmological elementals, of all things. Well, let me see if I can make that point clear.

In my opinion, with these two elementals, one can talk about important aspects in the very belief systems that predominate the world, and for which the differences of viewpoint, and the meaning systems that are created because of them, we have not only the strife so evident now, but the very difficulty of even being able to talk about it, or the specifics in the difficulties, in a way that can provide a common field of discussion. As such, I am hoping that Cosmolosophy can become that common field. As such, as well, you can see then, why my alternative strives for a specific mix of these "shorthands for tendencies" in both its intent, and its structure. The further hope being that it could also offer a kind of logical/feeling cover for seeing meaning in the need to tolerate each of the other frames of reference long enough to finally be on our way to making our own belief realities. And that, for me, is where this really gets interesting.

It seems to me that this parallels what the Entirety is already doing: namely instantiating, somehow, these possible paths of structure and meaning creation we call realities. And it is not nearly so far fetched as one might first think.

Just think about it. Off we go, each politically oriented, or religiously oriented, or whatever else oriented, vector into the universe. If we assume all things being equal in the tech and engineering that is utilized (and why wouldn't it be if we were all involved in creating those things -- so that everybody has the best that humanity has to offer in those regards; a covenant that must be honored or the whole enterprise is doomed from the start). And we also assume we have the wisdom to keep sharing as long as we can, it would then be up to that belief system to then see if it could sustain its own reality.

And these might actually turn into complete, separate realities, if for no other reason than, via expansion, and the limits of the speed of light, each vector of exploration, and habitat building, would eventually move beyond the direct information threshold to see any more of anything from the other vectors. Not to say we'd be out of all contact, of course; we'd still be able to do the possible "multipath" kind of indirect transfer, that we might be receiving now, but it would still constitute, for all intents and purposes for our perceptual limitations, to be separate realities.

So you might then say: "Well, it sounds like you're just trying to construct something we can all use to convince ourselves that something that has been intolerable so far, can have the way we look at it be changed enough so that it actually becomes tolerable?"

And to that I would reply: Yes. That is exactly what I am suggesting. Just as I am also suggesting that we can, in a way, describe ourselves into any reality we can dream up. This is the wonderful dichotomy inherent in the term Make Believe. Because we really can make something to believe in, we just need to be on the same page as to both how to talk about it, as well as what to talk about. Talking about it allows us to form a consensus on what, exactly we want to believe in, generally speaking (with that "generally" providing enough elbow room for everybody to keep the important aspects of their specific system in tact, without stepping out of the common framework) and then what might make sense in a living structure that also stays within that common framework. If we can get that consensus then it's simply mustering the will, each and every one of us, and the determination, knowing that sacrifices are going to have to be made, to work for what we've now created as Americans with a shared vision.

And on a personal note I can only say, the universe better be prepared because Americans with a shared vision are their own elemental force. And we are precisely the ones who can show the rest of the Entirety how it's done: How you actually can describe yourself into the reality you live, and express as, in the way you have always felt you were meant to.

To close here let me just say one last thing. I have been put in the unenviable position of being one of those people who come along, occasionally, to flip a switch. And the switch here can best be understood via the old aphorism "How can you know you are in the dark if nobody has ever turned the light on before. And this is unenviable not only because of the difficulty in even attempting to throw such "switches," but also because in this case it is one hell of switch flip on all of your asses; made all the worse because we are facing a very critical time factor here.

The simple fact of the matter is that a lot of things need to start getting done, and done quickly precisely because too much of what needs to be ultimately accomplished requires some pretty hefty lead times to set up; lead time setup that will have to compete with immediate problem solving so we can buy ourselves some time to get the lead up stuff done; all of which, of course, to give us the extra options we'll need, if things start getting really dicey on the planet.

I personally believe that, if we mobilize now; and by mobilize I mean on a level commensurate with what we did for World War 2 (not that we want in anyway to think of it as a war effort) we could take enough steps in the interim to make it be not only survivable, but livable. But we have to act ASAP because the threats we face are that serious:

The economic operating system we've been using is broken. Completely. Something for which there is now no possibility of fixing. There is human need in the world that absolutely must be addressed, for our own enlightened self interest, as well as to heed the call to common human decency and morality. And the planet itself has become fed up with our ignorance, greed, and petty tribalism. It is letting us know it is fed up because we've changed things in the atmosphere to make venting heat back into space not work as well as it used to. The sun needs to feed heat, and full spectrum light, to the planet of course, but there's always the possibility of too much, and so this particular part of Mother Earth has to keep playing the game of thermodynamics in overdrive; continuing to work to eliminate differentials.

So, much more water gets sucked up from the oceans and dumped, or not dumped, where it is needed. A lot more. And more wind gets to moving, blowing things down more, And more ice gets to melting, so more water gets hotter and circulation patterns have to change to account for it. On and on. Until eventually, unfortunately, even the fact the one of the poles is always away from the sun, there won't be much of any differential left at all. At which point, certainly, it will just become different degrees of baked.

And again, I will remind you all. It is not up to me to make this happen. I am here to attempt the articulation which would accomplish the hoped for flip of the switch. And poor thought this effort may be, it is the best that I was capable of doing. If there is indeed anything at all to be made of it, all of you must be a part of the making. That's just the way it is.

I await your answer.







Tuesday, August 22, 2017

The Things To Understand About Mother Earth, And Father Fortress.

In the one work of fiction I was able to do (in between being a programmer, and a Libertarian Socialist, and partly because I needed to show myself that I could do fiction, but also because I had to have a beginning vehicle with which to start talking about my Philosophy) "The Light Of Creation," I had in story names for the the two fundamentals of Cosmolosophy. They were clunky as hell names (The Crucible of Creation, and The Citadel of Certainty for The Elemental Embrace, and Mind respectively) that I didn't like at all at the time, but, for the life of me, I couldn't come up with anything else better to replace them with. Hopefully, I think I may have alternatives that I would like to propose. And those are, as you might already have guessed, are Mother Earth, and Father Fortress.

Let me also stress here that this is not an attempt to introduce some kind of quasi deities into a discussion of a philosophy. Not in the least. This is, rather, an effort to articulate essential tendencies in what I have already described as "unbounded infinite potential." And doing so using metaphorical entities as encapsulating shorthand to make the articulation easier to understand.

That being said, here is a beginning, or a continuation (it's hard for me to know which I stumbled into first), definition of these two elementals:

1. Mother Earth, or the Elemental Embrace, or Nature, or whatever else you want to call her, is the wild magic of unbridled fertility, riotous combination, creation, destruction and continual rebirth. It is the meaning space of the body, and physical space. Here the individual matters only as the possibility to keep the whole going. As such great pain, and pleasure. Extreme joy or sorrow. Equal desires for violence and calm. All are a part of her. And all must be born without question. The whole is all that matters, and choice is a luxury much too easily abused for her. The individual must always be sacrificed for the whole whenever needed. And always must each player in the game keep reproducing with the abandon appropriate to the wild animal lust it springs from.

2. Father Fortress is the rational objectifier who is the meaning space of the mind. He is the individual point of view created by an objectifying mind; a mind creating a separation between inner, and outer experience, so that mind can make meaningful connections on how things work around it as it grows in the process of associating living experience with the increasing accumulation of encapsulations that structure outside, and inside, experience relationships. And with that structure, and with the innate need to keep building more, does he make things to hold on to (which of course goes hand in hand for what we have a handle on, so as to be able to grasp at all in new ways). To be able to remember the things that work in the harsh world of physical space, where so many of the ways of "why" are still unknown the meaning processors. But of course he is also the one who cannot easily let go of the structures he has created. And cannot easily abide the change the always comes from the Mother Earth side. And of course, having identity, he is the one who most values the idea of choice, and is most insistent on the individual's right to keep it.

First, of course, is the question of possible false association of gender to either of these two elementals and the only answer that I can come up with so far, that feels even close to right, is to say that they are justified, and not justified, at the same time. This is difficult for me because I also see mother earth as possibly in terms of the Great Vagina, and Great Womb, that seduces, and induces surrender, and the falling into, of fullest immersion. Where then is the entity remade and born anew. Pretty much the Tantric idea of both perfect spiritual, and physical union. But then, of course, the thing to remember is that men are part women, and there's still a deep structural connection between us, and what is woman, despite the meaning systems of the other chromosome coding. So even if we were to try and do stereotypical finger pointing via gender types, we'd still be pointing at ourselves in a bit way, so it wouldn't make much sense to even try. All the while the guilt from the empathy thing, for either sex in dumping either elemental, (even though we are only talking metaphorically here), on them as "that is their gender thing," makes you feel uncomfortable for even considering doing.

Be that as it may, but also indirectly to related to the above, interestingly enough, is what I think might be the, perhaps unexpected, little detail of how Mother Earth is not where empathy comes from.

Empathy must come from the individual's choice to try and imagine what another meaning processor is experiencing. However, in order for that to have any real meaning, the individual must be able to access things through both Body Meaning space (at least in part) in order to more fully immerse themselves into as much of what that other has going on in both their Mind meaning space, and Body Meaning space, and Physical Meaning space situations; In other words they have to access both the rational aspects, as well as the feeling aspects, of another, in order to truly get into an empathic connection; a life habit, of course, for which said individual would have no clue about unless they were patiently nurtured into it. Which, in case you haven't been paying attention, a lack in generational stability, received inside cooperating, self supportive communities, that also provide continuity, as well as general material well being for everyone, would make providing such a human necessary trait all but impossible one would thing. Any more than keeping a good sense of what reason should be within such a deficiency.

I would also suggest that Mother Earth is not where a sense of ecology comes from. And I say that because she does not want to be concerned with remembering anything, even though, of course, she is possible only by the very nature of physical meaning space making structure possible at all to begin with; as chunks of matter lead to chemistry, which leads to bio chemistry, which leads to DNA, and then to the encoded associations of meanings that are able to get so worked up about having sex in the first place. No, to be able to be concerned about the big picture you need to not only have the ability to organize things into grouped relationships, you must also be able to layer those groupings in ever more complex ways, and for that you need very subtle structure. Lots and lots of meaningfully subtle structure.

The bottom line, though, for me is that, as the empathy example suggests, we can see very clearly, why both sides of this metaphorical divide need to be listened to, in every way we can, if one is to be on a path that gives you the best qualities of both elementals, for the best chance for you, and the whole, to flourish, as well as grow; with diversity in structure, and depth in the textured feelings of its meaning, as well as simply more quantity.

And if you think you have better suggestions for the names, or other thoughts about how the two should, or shouldn't for that matter, interact, make a comment here, or maybe you should start your own blog; a blog for a more comprehensive view of what you think would be a better description of their traits, and their interactions. Get a few of those going and I'd be willing to bet we' have some very interesting takes on how the entirety works. Something to think about at least.






Monday, August 21, 2017

An Interesting Duality In The Notion Of "Taking The Big Leap."

In my song "The Three Leaps Of Life" I used to think that, out of the three (the intuitive leap, the leap of faith, and that "final leap", as I used to say it) that the final leap was simply a person making the choice to stop being at all; an interpretation that seemed both logical, and correct of feeling; until now.

Now I have come to realization that I was looking at this last leap idea incorrectly. For you see there can never be any kind of final leap, there are only leaps where you don't know for certain if you, as an identity, will continue processing anymore, in any meaningful way.

Now, that might seem like a small distinction, but it turns out it has a quite significant logical consequence. And to understand that you first have to understand what happens, at least as I understand the process, when one lets go of conscious organization long enough (either meditatively, or chemically, so that there is no filtering; and therefor no reaffirmation of the separation of inner and outer meaning space interaction;  precisely because there is no objectifying by the identity matrix; the very matrix that is your ability to function as a meaning processor, created from the frame of reference of the unique experience association path that formed that matrix), a big part of which we refer to as your inner dialogue, one takes something of a risk. This is something that is called Ego Death. And one of the reasons great meditation required significant training and discipline, quite apart from being able to meditate properly in the first place, challenging though that can be, was that one had to be first given the confidence in self to allow for the leap of faith it takes to let go of one's self at all, in the first place. And it takes a leap of faith because what you are doing is quite simply not existing for a while as an operating, organized meaning matrix I just mentioned a moment ago. That matrix, in a sense, is allowed to float in, a supposed, better infusion of both you and whatever bigger experience one is now floating in, without organizational identity.

Setting aside for the moment consideration of why that combining is a "supposed, better infusion," I think we're better served in our effort to understand "letting go" in this sense by finishing how the process is supposed to work. Eventually, and this is the tricky part, it is assumed that the confident self will have the ever present residual holding power, of its own organization, to allow it to find a way, some how, to re integrate itself with an inclusion of what was fused with, so that you return to you, but in a variable degree of new, for that new way to be you. And in that variable new degree of new you, it is hoped, is a new enough frame of reference with which to see important new connections; so as to create important new ideas.

As you might imagine, then, the risk here is really two fold:

1. Not being a confident self, it panics on approach to this "merging," and in fighting it in panic mode, the new sensory state, half in or half out hardly matters, might create fear born, desperate attempts to create old meaning where it cannot be found now, setting up a mental, experience feedback loop, that simply breaks the person's psyche. And I can tell you honestly folks, having had to talk friends down from bad LSD trips, if you don't "love bomb" them (which, as I recall, was what Ken Kesey, and the merry pranksters, resorted to when they'd encountered a bad trip during one of their LSD happenings as explained in "The Electric Kool Aid Test", by Tom Wolfe) or "calm bomb" them or "chill bomb" them, or whatever other groove cliche you might want to use, to not exactly explain it right; if you don't do that whatever bomb it takes, to break up the bad looping, they will likely have a psychotic break.

2. Though confident enough to not panic on entry, the self still finds itself caught up short by whatever magical process is involved to allow one, currently idling, identity matrix to merge, in what the SQL language would be called either a  "UNION ALL," or a "UNION UNIQUE" command. Of course, what the magic does with these, if anything, since it is conjecture, I have no idea (yet), but I will tell you this. I have been to idling as a meaning processor, and I have come back. And the results can be everything from only nice, to amazing, to terrifying.

I have to say at the beginning for me, it never really occurred to me to fear letting go, I just did it because it was, as in posts before have indicated, something that just clicked. Somehow, ahead of time, I had already built the discipline of self (whatever exact qualities that requires because I don't think I could list very many), and I already felt, deep down, that I would come back, somehow. As I did, and as I have always done since. And to this day I still can't tell you where exactly I go, or how I come back, but I do.

The thing is, you do this enough, you come to a point where having it happen only via great meditative effort is no longer required. You can, in fact, slip in out, quite at every little whim, and nuance, all around you, because everything around you now can trigger connections; and this can easily go too far if you're not careful. Because eventually the merging process itself can simply take over as a quite unhealthy constant state of constant rebirth. Intoxicating in one sense, but quite without the memory to hold anything long enough for loving, and thoughtful, structure to continue, in another. And for reasons and feelings I'm still not sure of yet, the entirety really needs realities to try and do just that; keeping loving, and thoughtful structure continuing (just as it wants you to let go from time to time, but also to come back and still be significantly you), and growing. Because somehow, we are going to find larger frames of reference with which to grow into.

In any case, though, in this kind of letting go and falling away, even though there is risk, there is still a good chance of "you" coming back; it just might not be exactly the same you as before. In contemplating death, the situation is much the same. The identity matrix that is the self goes away. And in this instance, of course, the going away is certainly of a fundamentally different sort of causality; as in complete bio chemical, and electrical, systems failure. The physical meaning system that supports it stops functioning because of either a specific disease pathology, or accumulated replication errors in the translation of kernel functionality from one complete cell state, to the existence of an original, and a new copy. That being said, however, does not change the fact the process of falling away into a new perceptual environment, even if it is objectively brief, is still going to be one where there is a, what I think must be, a great similarity with the subjective experience of ego death meditation; increasingly not filtered, though, also possibly limited as the body functions less than normal, as the self falls away with the dimming, immense physical space stimuli that is normally always there for us to be immersed in.

The obvious expectation here, of course, and for good reason, is that the self is absolutely not coming back. But here's the thing. In that last mingling. In that last (and of course last only from the perspective of this identity matrix), infusion who's to say what happens as a rebirth integration into something that is something else, but is also a big part of you. Just because you don't get to continue being you from your current perspective doesn't mean that a good portion of you isn't now beginning a new continuation of identity; and who knows what it might remember of the you here. And that, of course is on top of the people here who will have you in them in ways that neither party will ever fully understand.

And now I can refer back to the cliche about death that I have the feeling most people are probably sick to death of by now and that is the one that Keanu Reeves spoke as the main, alien cloned human, character in the remake of "The Day The Earth Stood Still." Trying to comfort the young boy, stepchild, of the main female character, whose father died as a soldier, he says: "Nothing ever really dies, it just transforms." Indicating, of course, that some fool, little bit of essence, or spirit, carries forward. And maybe a little is all it takes after all, but, I'm still here to tell you that it is probably a lot more than that, and then some to boot.

You do continue. It's just, I think, altered enough that it has to associate in its own new reality; creating yet another new branching of similar such paths, of such vastly complex, experience association. And you, as an identity, never stop, I think. Never completely anyway. You may never really have started anywhere either for that matter, for the beginning, and the continuation, all started at the same time, in that odd, cause and effect, duality that things of a "cosmos" sort of orientation sort of just aggregate to. Which is just more stuff to "bake your noodle" as the Oracle used to say; whether Neo, or Morpheus, were around or not. Of course she was only trying to provide contrast too. Not to tell you what would be but to give you a way of looking at things that might allow you to find your own best choices. Which I always thought was pretty cool for an oracle.

Anyways... That's the bottom line as far as I can see now. You do continue. It just depends on how you look at it, as always.

The question then becomes should everybody try this falling away to a release of ego, and the hoped for return?  And the answer is an unequivocal Absolutely Not! This is just too risky (just in case having already talked about psychotic breaks wasn't enough to make that clear), despite what possible reward might be attainable. And even if it did work you really have to understand that the revised you might not be anything you were either hoping for, or expected. And because of that your life from that moment forward could never be the same at all; putting you on a new life path the former you would have never have wanted, or even contemplated. I know because that's what happened to me. And let me just say that, no matter what few upsides there may be here, and however amazing a particular one might be, the downsides are many; the most prominent one perhaps being the loneliness inherent in now becoming the only person who can see things a certain way. A way that might not be any better than the old way, and in fact, might actually be worse in the long run. And even if it is better you may never be able to get anybody to understand it, let alone want to try it.

My hope is that, in the decriminalization of psychoactive drugs, our society will open itself to the careful investigation of the beneficial properties these drugs might provide; and perhaps as a part of that we can also investigate the intricacies of letting go of the ego. There have already been new reports that these drugs may have surprising benefits in a variety of therapeutic settings. We really need to look into this a lot deeper.