If that doesn't put you both in awe, and great trepidation, if not outright terror, than I guess nothing will.
Rocks Under I-95 Present Odd, and Scary, Threat to Power Grid
See Also:
[Post Note: Everything affects everything else, often as collateral damage, as mentioned in other posts. And so now our decisions have vastly greater effects. And it is one thing to talk about pumping more and more turbulence into both natural, and social systems, over human lengths of time, and seeing the accumulating instabilities that result; which then lead us to ever more dangerous competitions with other players, also making possible, collateral damage decisions; in that context, it is one thing to talk about that kind of input of turbulence, but to then think of doing a quantity of turbulent input, over what is essentially quantum moments of time, in amounts to rival the output of a star, at a single point, over an importantly populated area, is to do as many periods of, of as many centuries long industrializations, as there are nukes that explode, in whatever exchange you might want to imagine. An exchange that probably wouldn't last longer than 20 to thirty minutes or so, give or take a few, to be sure. How anybody thinks that is going to help an already precarious total system is just an amazement to me. I mean, even if one nuke went off, especially in the wrong place (start a really big fire storm some place, set the peat bogs in Siberia on fire? Fed by locked up methane in the not so permanent permafrost? Another underground coal fire? The list could go on) , it could tip the balance of no return for us as having a livable habitat. J.V.]
COLOR US SHOCKED
Morbid Researchers Imagine A 'Best-Case Scenario' For Nuclear War, And The Results Are Grim
How many nukes could an aggressor nation drop on an enemy before the effects of nuclear winter come back to haunt them?
No comments:
Post a Comment